Re: First mention of Web semantics via typed links in press/interview?

out of interest, I've been using the term 'typed link' when explaining 
the sem web and linked data to people over the past year, and found 
that they are very receptive to it, especially if you start from html 
w/ href, then typed link being href + rel, then how that's a triple, 
then how you can swap the href value for a literal like a string or 
number to describe things.

Best,

Nathan

Dan Brickley wrote:
> Just found this,
> 
> '''By the "understanding" part I assume you are talking about putting
> more machine-understandable semantics into the web.
> This will start with typed links -- we have been prototyping a
> discussion system for example with the WIT (W3 Interactive Talk)
> experiment. This addition of semantics is going to be essential if
> computers are to more of the work for us in manipulating this web,
> as at the moment it's only people who can read it.'''
> 
> ... in an old (1994) TimBL interview
> http://www.w3.org/History/1994/WWW/Journals/InternetWorld/Interview.txt
> 
> Not sure if it was every published elsewhere. It came after the first
> webconf plenary talk whose slides at http://www.w3.org/Talks/WWW94Tim/
> I'm forever borrowing, and which remain my favourite visualization of
> what we're trying to achieve architecturally.
> 
> Anyway nice blast from the past, thought it worth sharing.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan
> 
> ps. other Web history bits and pieces are at
> http://www.delicious.com/danbri/webhistory (yahoo permitting)
> 
> pps. a bit more on WIT is at http://www.w3.org/WIT/User/Overview.html
> (although the /Discussion link is sadly broken). IMHO still much more
> work to do in that area...
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:18:16 UTC