> > Context infidelity == you are shifting the landscape that define the rules > of the conversation I was trying to have. > Yes, I'm trying to shift the collective conversation around the LOD Cloud to recognize and include the idea, which really ought to be fairly uncontroversial, that quantity and quality are intertwined. Verbosely reified CSV cells, as William noted, are a particularly obvious example: they increase the number of triples out of proportion to their usefulness. If you don't want to participate in this part of the conversation, don't. It's a public forum, nobody owns "the context". Until some more people weigh in, I don't have any idea what "the list" (or, in this case, the three lists) cares about. Raw scale? Accuracy? User experience? Nine other things we haven't even mentioned? None of this?
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 01:30:34 UTC