Re: rdfa vs. links

Ian Davis made a compelling case for layering RDF into the web of
documents in a blog post 3 years ago [1]. I still agree with his main
point:

"""
My belief is that trust must be considered far earlier and that it
largely comes from usage and the wisdom of the crowds, not from
technology. Trust is a social problem and the best solution is one
that involves people making informed judgements on the metadata they
encounter. To make an effective evaluation they need to have the
ability to view and explore metadata with as few barriers as possible.
In practice this means that the web of data needs to be as accessible
and visible as the web of documents is today and it needs to
interweave transparently.
"""

I also like RDFa because it allows people to expose the contents of
their database by simply modifying some HTML templates. You don't have
to install a triple store, or put up a SPARQL endpoint, etc. There are
some bits you have to be careful with the subject URIs in your
assertions, but that's not much different than using
application/rdf+xml or text/turtle in my opinion.

//Ed

[1] http://blog.iandavis.com/2007/11/is-the-semantic-web-destined-to-be-a-shadow

Received on Sunday, 24 October 2010 22:03:37 UTC