Dr. Sowa, I agree, that is what the document says.. There seems to be preference to the usage of "Collections" rather than altLabels. But there is some references to usage " list of values ", if call them so, in that document there... as lables and Collections. All of that looks primitive, is you compare to traditional programming languages .. ( like Java..) .. but then this is SemWeb technology. I will leave up to the SKOS work group experts to figure out the rest.. Pavithra --- On Sat, 10/9/10, John F. Sowa <sowa@bestweb.net> wrote: From: John F. Sowa <sowa@bestweb.net> Subject: Re: using SKOS for controlled values for controlled vocabulary To: "Pavithra" <pavithra_kenjige@yahoo.com> Cc: "KenLaskey" <klaskey@mitre.org>, "William Waites" <ww@styx.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net Date: Saturday, October 9, 2010, 4:49 PM On 10/9/2010 4:40 PM, Pavithra wrote: > It is also possible to use |skos:altLabel| to represent cases of /upward > posting/ [ISO-2788 > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-skos-primer-20090818/#ISO2788>]. That > is, when a concept aggregates more-specialized notions that are not > explicitly introduced as concepts in the considered KOS: > > ex:rocks rdf:type skos:Concept; > skos:prefLabel "rocks"@en; > skos:altLabel "basalt"@en; > skos:altLabel "granite"@en; > skos:altLabel "slate"@en Bigus Dealus Gloriosus. Is that supposed to be *simple* ? Perhaps it is for somebody who has been tortured by RDF and OWL. JohnReceived on Saturday, 9 October 2010 21:34:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:20 UTC