- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:37:59 -0400
- To: Roberto Mirizzi <roberto.mirizzi@gmail.com>
- CC: Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
On 10/7/10 12:51 PM, Roberto Mirizzi wrote: > Il 07/10/2010 18:27, Kingsley Idehen ha scritto: >>> For instance, you could clearly see >>> http://ookaboo.com/o/pictures/topic/28999/Beijing >>> as a signifier for a city. Some people would make the assertion that >>> dbpedia:Beijing owl:sameAs ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing. >>> and that's not entirely stupid. On the other hand, it's definitely >>> true that >>> ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing is sioc:ImageGallery. >>> Put something true together with a practice that's common and you >>> get the absurd result that >>> dbpedia:Beijing is sioc:ImageGallery. >> >> Hopefully my response clears this all up, at least a little :-) >> > We recently discussed about similar issues, anyway it's still quite > obsure for me why this: > > dbpedia:Beijing owl:sameAs ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing . Where did that come from? Did you make that claim or did something else? > ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing rdf:type sioc:ImageGallery. > > => dbpedia:Beijing rdf:type sioc:ImageGallery. > > is not a problem. Is a problem, that's wrong too :-) Maybe the *focal point* of an image (or what the image isAbout) that's part of a collection, for instance. Kingsley > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2010 17:38:31 UTC