- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:54:15 -0500
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 17:54:48 UTC
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > What are the odds of getting a group (pref through w3c) set-up quickly so > that all of those working on and interesting in RDF+JSON can openly discuss, > align and essentially do the heavy lifting pre-standardization? > > I'm very aware that there are multiple people with multiple approaches all > working at the same time here, some communication but not loads, and that we > could all either align and make progress, or end up with another 5 > semi-supported rdf+json variants before any official effort starts, which > wouldn't really be ideal. > This was one of the potential work items for a (hypothetical) new RDF Core Working Group which was discussed at the RDF Next steps workshop [1]. See the JSON section at [2], which got a decent amount of support back then [3]. [4] shows the results of the public survey. Steph. [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF_Core_Work_Items#JSON [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/rdf-work-items/table [4] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/rdf-2010/results#xg3 > Best, > > Nathan > >
Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 17:54:48 UTC