- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:24:56 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Mandag 08 november 2010 01:51, skrev Raphaël Troncy: > lode:atTime > [ time:inXSDDateTime "2010-01-24T20:00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ]; OMG! That additional complexity is something I would certainly want to avoid. I guess there may be good OWL reasons why one would want to do that, but I cannot think of any good reasons why you would want to put the data type into the predicate like this in most cases. Just think about the horror of writing this in RDFa... And how it also becomes an extra line in a SPARQL query. The event ontology really needs a predicate which has the event as domain and xsd:dateTime as range, for the stated purpose. Cheers, Kjetil
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 10:25:30 UTC