- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:49:34 +0000
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Cc: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:50:58 -0700 Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there some reason not to use LODE? > > http://linkedevents.org/ontology/ A few, though they could possibly be addressed by a revision of LODE: 1. lode:Event appears to be restricted to events which have already happened. One of the main use cases for EON is to describe events which are planned. 2. Its time properties use OWL Time which is overly complicated for the lightweight FOAF-style vocabulary I'm aiming for, suitable for easy embedding in web pages. 3. It's missing certain properties that seem to be useful to cover the kind events that are advertised/mentioned on the Web - cost, booking links, etc. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2010 22:49:58 UTC