W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Best practice for RDF vocabularies documentation reference?

From: Iker Huerga <iker.huerga@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:03:39 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTik9x0j6ODb5Pe-_GyM2mOfzRXC7sV4SxqxaP9RG@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Hello,

What about dcterms:isPartOf [1] or dcterms:isReferencedBy [2] ?

Kind Regards.

[1] http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-isPartOf
[2] http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-isReferencedBy

2010/11/3 Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>

> Hello all
>
> Suppose you have the RDF vocabulary defined by the URI
> http://example.org/vocab redirecting to http://example.org/vocab.rdf and
> maybe http://example.org/vocab.html through conneg.
> Now you have a primer in PDF for this vocabulary at
> http://example.org/vocab/primer.pdf
> How would you reference this documentation file from inside
> http://example.org/vocab.rdf?
> I suppose one would include this reference in the <owl:Ontology rdf:about="
> http://example.org/vocab"> element.
> Using rdfs:seeAlso seems OK, but one would like some more precise property.
>
>
> Ideas welcome
>
> Bernard
>
> Tried to figure practices by browsing ontology headers starting at
> http://prefix.cc/popular/all list but nothing obvious appears ...
> Cool resource, BTW
>
>
> --
> Bernard Vatant
> Senior Consultant
> Vocabulary & Data Engineering
> Tel:       +33 (0) 971 488 459
> Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Mondeca
> 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
> Web:    http://www.mondeca.com
> Blog:    http://mondeca.wordpress.com
> ----------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Iker
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 13:08:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:24 UTC