- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:52:42 +0100
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 25 March 2010 17:36, Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> wrote: > Danny-- > > After reading your OP and several responses, I'm still not sure exactly what this thread is about. Is the problem > > - "who [or what] is this "Julius Caesar" that these ancient texts talk about?" > > - "I can't read these ancient texts [in which names including "Julius Caesar" might appear, only I can't tell because I can't read them]?" > > - both? The second one we appear to be able to deal with, the cloud as someone (Peter?) said before. Broad data redundancy (as far as I can see) seems a done deal. But the indexes for it, the names for things, dare I say it - the metadata - seems very delicate. > --Frank "feeling he needs an example" I have a bunch of pages online about my homemade guitar. Maybe 1k of text, 1MB of images. Because I put a lot of effort in, I believe this to important information. But I can't for the life of me remember what I called the pages, and I'm sure there are a couple of clones already. So how do I tell you (and your agents) how to find these things? Or to put it another, let's say bronze age man asked for two pints of semi-skimmed to be delivered. Easy note for the milkman, just make a circle of stones. Beh, that's a bit distractory - but all the hippies turn up at stonehenge for the summer solstice, but from what I gather the alignments are better for the shortest day. I guess it's discoverability (& to a lesser extent provenance). Can I see your first web page please Frank? Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:53:15 UTC