- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 08:50:13 +1000
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 1 July 2010 07:25, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:18:25 -0700 > Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Here are the reasons I voted this way: >> >> - it will mess up RDF/XML > > No it won't - it will just mean that RDF/XML is only capable of > representing a subset of RDF graphs. And guess what? That's already > the case. Could you point me to an example of a valid RDF graph that RDF/XML cannot represent? I have heard people say this before but I don't remember ever seeing an example. Thanks, Peter
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 22:50:46 UTC