Re: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

On 1 July 2010 07:25, Toby Inkster <> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:18:25 -0700
> Jeremy Carroll <> wrote:
>> Here are the reasons I voted this way:
>> - it will mess up RDF/XML
> No it won't - it will just mean that RDF/XML is only capable of
> representing a subset of RDF graphs. And guess what? That's already
> the case.

Could you point me to an example of a valid RDF graph that RDF/XML
cannot represent? I have heard people say this before but I don't
remember ever seeing an example.



Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 22:50:46 UTC