- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:45:35 -0700
- To: Jiří Procházka <ojirio@gmail.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, nathan@webr3.org, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Jiří Procházka wrote: > > I wonder, when using owl:sameAs or related, to "name" literals to be > able to say other useful thing about them in normal triples (datatype, > language, etc) does it break OWL DL yes it does > (or any other formalism which is > base of some ontology extending RDF semantics)? Not OWL full > Or would it if > rdf:sameAs was introduced? > It would still break OWL DL > Best, > Jiri > OWL DL is orthogonal to this issue. The OWL DLers already prohibit certain RDF - specifically the workaround for not having literal as subjects. So they are neutral. I reiterate that I agree whole-heartedly with the technical arguments for making this change; however the economic case is missing. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 22:46:19 UTC