On 7/17/2010 8:44 PM, Renato Iannella wrote: > The SWIG Charter on IPR does not state that: ("not" seems to be a typo!) > "W3C reminds participants to disclose, where known, the IPR status of information that they share in the Interest Group meetings and materials, in accordance with Section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy" > > See: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/swig-charter.html#Ipr thanks that was helpful. Note any such disclosure is done by mailing a different list, to leave this list for engineering issues. From offlist discussion it seems that I misunderstood the intent behind the message that prompted me to start this thread; I fear I have overreacted, sorry to all. There does seem to be a related (I18N) policy question, that I have asked the lawyers, for those interested, please see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-psig/2010JulSep/0002.html Member only link. (In my view further discussion of that issue is not appropriate on this list). JeremyReceived on Monday, 19 July 2010 02:39:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:19 UTC