- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:17:11 +0200
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Ross Singer <rossfsinger@gmail.com>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 6 July 2010 13:34, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Danny Ayers wrote: >> :Jo rdfs:value "Jo" >> >> together with >> >> :Jo rdf:type rdfs:Literal >> >> ? > > 1: is there and rdfs:value? (rdf:value) My mistake, it is rdf:value > 2: I would *love* to see rdf:value with a usable tight definition that > everybody can rely on It's certainly usable, but the definition is about as open as it could be: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfvalue http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_value http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#rdfValue ...in fact it rather resembles a bnode in the property position. Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 19:06:01 UTC