Danny Ayers wrote: > I've been studiously avoiding this rat king of a thread, but just on > this suggestion: > > On 2 July 2010 11:16, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org> wrote: > ... >> Serialization formats could support >> >> "Jo" :nameOf :Jo >> >> as a shortcut for >> >> [ owl:sameAs "Jo"; :nameOf :Jo] >> >> and a store could (internally) store the latter as >> >> "Jo" :nameOf :Jo >> >> for compactness and efficiency. > > what about keeping the internal storage idea, but instead of owl:sameAs, using: > > :Jo rdfs:value "Jo" > > together with > > :Jo rdf:type rdfs:Literal > > ? 1: is there and rdfs:value? (rdf:value) 2: I would *love* to see rdf:value with a usable tight definition that everybody can rely on Best, NathanReceived on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 11:35:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:19 UTC