- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:35:18 +0100
- To: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>
- Cc: "Linked Data community" <public-lod@w3.org>, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:03:19 +0200 "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> wrote: > So, if > > :s "lit" :o . > > must not have a semantic meaning, what about > > "lit" rdf:type rdf:Property . > > ? As, according to what you say above, you are willing to allow for > literals in subject position, this triple is fine for you > syntactically. But what about its meaning? Would this also be > officially defined to have no meaning? It would have a meaning. It would just be a false statement. The same as the following is a false statement: foaf:Person a rdf:Property . -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 13:36:25 UTC