Re: RDF Scoping Mechanism

On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Nathan wrote:

> Pat Hayes wrote:
>> It wouldn't take very much to make into full first-order logic: all  
>> it needs is a scoping mechanism (think graph literals in N3 or  
>> named graphs, or my 'surfaces' idea from the Blogic talk) and  
>> negation. Mind you, that scoping mechanism would drive a truck  
>> through triple-store-based implementations, I suspect. Back to tree  
>> structures and Sexpressions, no doubt :-)
>
> Obvious question, regardless of implementations, is there any chance  
> of getting that scoping mechanism in to RDF through W3C to rec?
>
> Any rough ideas how long that process may take? (I'm assuming the  
> RDF Semantics are bug-less and this would just be an addition).

Given the amount of Sturm and Drang that something as trivial as  
allowing literals in subject position has generated, I would think the  
answer is, likely not in my lifetime.

Pat

>
> My logic here is that if other serializations or even something N3- 
> like were to go through standardization, then work would probably  
> have to start on getting said scoping mech in to RDF sooner rather  
> than later.
>
> Best,
>
> Nathan
>

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 18:07:16 UTC