On 07/01/2010 09:11 PM, Henry Story wrote: > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > On 1 Jul 2010, at 21:03, Tim Finin wrote: > >> On 7/1/10 2:51 PM, Henry Story wrote: >>> ... >>> So just as a matter of interest, imagine a new syntax came along that allowed literals in >>> subject position, could you not write a serialiser for it that turned >>> "123" length 3 . >>> Into >>> _:b owl:sameAs "123"; >>> length 3. >>> ? >>> So that really you'd have to do no work at all? >>> Just wondering.... >> >> Isn't owl:sameAs defined to be a relation between two >> URI references? > > Not sure. It is, this won't work under OWL DL... In OWL Full if I think it will. I asked about this recently on this list... > In any case I suppose it would be simple to crete such an identity relation. > >> Even if not, it is symmetric and >> would have the above imply {"123" owl:sameAs _:b .} > > It does indeed imply that, though you can't write it out like that > in most serialisations, other than N3. > > And being able to write it out, makes it easy to explain what symmetry means. > > I think people keep confusing syntax and semantics for some reason, even on > the semantic web. > > HenryReceived on Thursday, 1 July 2010 19:26:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:19 UTC