- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 19:03:19 +0200
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>
- Cc: paoladimaio10 <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTinHhphaDIlUDpjz1pXu6_-5tSHMW2TyrmdwTk7u@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Henry I guess we should not confuse the grammatical kind of the natural language term used to label the predicate, which is not necessarily a verb :myCat :color :black (noun) :myCat :hasColor :black (verb) :myCat :colored :black (adjective) ... with the underlying semantics of the triple : a sentence in which the predicate is in the verb position and carries more or less explicitly the function of a verb And I think this is the point of Paola question. The label used, if it's not a verb, is most of the time (always?) a shortcut (ellipse) for a more verbose (verbal) form, even in your example (2 2) plus 4. > is a shortcut for (2 2) 'has result by addition' 4 or any other similar expression using "yields" "gives", whatever ... I don't see any predicate making sense which cannot be expanded in natural language into a verbal expression, at least in languages I know of, close to english in their use of verbal forms. French does not differ on this. A triple is an assertion. Verbs are the natural way to make assertions. At least that's what I've be taught in my village school in France back in the 50's. "A well-formed sentence contains a verb." Granted that was the time of ink and quills, but ... Cheers Bernard -- Bernard Vatant Senior Consultant Vocabulary & Data Engineering Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com ---------------------------------------------------- Mondeca 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Web: http://www.mondeca.com Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com ----------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 17:04:50 UTC