- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:49:45 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, nathan@webr3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hello! On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > > On Jun 30, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Toby Inkster wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:18:25 -0700 >> Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com> wrote: >> >>> Here are the reasons I voted this way: >>> >>> - it will mess up RDF/XML >> >> No it won't - it will just mean that RDF/XML is only capable of >> representing a subset of RDF graphs. And guess what? That's already >> the case. >> > > EXACTLY. I whole-heartedly agree with Pat and Toby, here... This is a small fix, and would get rid of one of the most obviously broken thing in the current RDF spec. We had a fairly heated discussion about that on IRC, last Tuesday, which might be worth pointing to as it exposes arguments from both sides of the fence: http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2010-06-29.html#T11-41-34 Best, y > > Pat > > >> -- >> Toby A Inkster >> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> >> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 13:53:12 UTC