W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:41:38 -0500
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, nathan@webr3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-Id: <29F03676-74A8-4D79-9D70-78F6AFFBC8F3@ihmc.us>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>

On Jun 30, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:18:25 -0700
> Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> Here are the reasons I voted this way:
>>
>> - it will mess up RDF/XML
>
> No it won't - it will just mean that RDF/XML is only capable of
> representing a subset of RDF graphs. And guess what? That's already
> the case.
>

EXACTLY.

Pat


> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 03:14:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:18 UTC