Re: RDF/XML Syntax Question: Label on an RDF Object being a literal

just remembered a local dialect thing "mon crape un goo" - get the bits that
work, and run with them. That is what my granny used to say.

On 1 March 2010 00:31, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am not a logician, but I believe there has been some hair-tugging over
> the treatment of literals & resources. Technically and mathematically, it's
> wrong as it it stands in the specs. Bit strange given that the people behind
> it were the best in the world, but there you go.
>
> Until a reformulation of the RDF model comes along, we have to play with it
> pragmatically - a literal is a string etc.
>
> Please don't be scared by the fact that there are errors, it's usable, this
> stuff can be applied to the wire.
>
> The Italians say piano piano to mean we just do a little, and get their
> eventually.  A better saying is "may you live in interesting times", major
> curse. But that is where we are.
>
> Love,
> Danny.
>
>
> On 28 February 2010 23:34, Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, substitute rdfs:label for ex:readableLabel there.
>>
>> Damian
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://danny.ayers.name
>
>


-- 
http://danny.ayers.name