I may be getting this all wrong, but HTTP upgrade? http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.42 #g -- Danny Ayers wrote: > Thinking out loud... > > just a thought, your user agent says http://example.org, but it also > says xmpp://blah > > http://something are excellent identifiers, but can we not throw in a > header to say "quick stuff here". > > I expect someone's already spec'd this out... > > > Er, in humans way, you send me a message over email/im/facebook, and I > say to you, let's take this to *another. We talk over a different > protocol. > > So we shift to another protocol. Advertised in the headers. > > > Why not fire a header over http to say - use this other protocol now. > The http identifiers stand, but if you need something like realtime > you can get it. > > Use the http:// as the bottom line (we can always resolve that), keep > the identifiers, but work on maybe three levels - 7 > > inside the vm > http > xmpp > > (I would suggest more, but lack imagination) >Received on Sunday, 28 February 2010 18:25:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:16 UTC