- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:32:50 -0800
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>, pfps@research.bell-labs.com, semantic-web@w3.org, sandro@w3.org, Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl
Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> [2010-02-03 15:44-0000] > >>> It also might be worth starting to consider whether to align the terminals >>> (qnames) more with sparql first. >>> >> Or perhaps align both with CURIEs <http://www.w3.org/TR/curie/> ? >> > > I read [[ Host languages MAY define additional constraints on these syntax rules when CURIES are used in the context of those host languages. Host languages MUST NOT relax the constraints defined this specification. ]] which seems to suggest that within Turtle one might want to consider how to disallow ?s?o:n1.?s2?p2:n2 as a single CURIE or maybe not I think it is reasonable to require user to add a single WS as in ?s?o:n1. ?s2?p2:n2 then to require reading the . as punctuation, so that the first curie is :n1 and the second is :n2 Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 23:33:43 UTC