W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2010

Re: CURIEs in Turtle

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:32:50 -0800
Message-ID: <4B6A07A2.4080200@topquadrant.com>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>, pfps@research.bell-labs.com, semantic-web@w3.org, sandro@w3.org, Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl
Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> [2010-02-03 15:44-0000]
>>> It also might be worth starting to consider whether to align the terminals
>>> (qnames) more with sparql first.
>> Or perhaps align both with CURIEs <http://www.w3.org/TR/curie/> ?

I read

Host languages MAY define additional constraints on these syntax rules 
when CURIES are used in the context of those host languages. Host 
languages MUST NOT relax the constraints defined this specification.


which seems to suggest that within Turtle one might want to consider how 
to disallow

?s?o:n1.?s2?p2:n2 as a single CURIE

or maybe not

I think it is reasonable to require user to add a single WS as in

?s?o:n1. ?s2?p2:n2 

then to require reading the . as punctuation, so that the first curie is :n1 and the second is :n2

Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 23:33:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:16 UTC