- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:22:01 -0800
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, pfps@research.bell-labs.com, semantic-web@w3.org
Toby Inkster wrote: >> It also might be worth starting to consider whether to align the terminals >> (qnames) more with sparql first. > > Or perhaps align both with CURIEs <http://www.w3.org/TR/curie/> ? I'd rather set a principle here to figure out what would be the reason for this. A use case I'd see is mapping directly Turtle into SPARQL 1.1 Update INSERT DATA blocks both directions. That would seem pretty good to unify and make work well which would benefit users. So in that case, align as much as possible in terminals and details of the syntax between these two - qnames, URIs and other details (e.g. '''quoting'''). It also begs the question whether sparql 1.1 update should take on some more turtle syntax like @prefix in the triples block so you really can cut and paste them. CURIE, XML QName and other alignment seems less of a priority to me. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:22:33 UTC