- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:50:18 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Cc: pfps@research.bell-labs.com, semantic-web@w3.org
* Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2010-02-02 07:54-0800] > Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > Peter, all, anyone interested in debugging a mapping from a turtle > > grammar to triple production rules? > > http://www.w3.org/2010/01/31-Turtle#⋈ > > > > I still need to stick encoding issues in there (like \"), > > but this should serve as a start. > > I'm interested and it seems the right direction but I'm finding this a > little hard to understand. I'm certainly sympathetic to that. Any ideas gratefully investigated. > I'd hope that we can get out a strong > mapping (like this) which is sufficiently formal that it addresses the > concerns Peter raised in 2008 [1] yeah, that's what motivated this. pfps outlines a recipe and i need to test my recipe against his. his target is ntriples, while i prefer to map to RDF terms and count on the ntriples spec to turn escaped URIs into IRIs. > It also might be worth starting to consider whether to align the terminals > (qnames) more with sparql first. the productions ref'd in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/31-Turtle#⋈ are from a yacker mockup of "TurtleS" (Turtle using SPARQL terminals and productions, where applicable). it may still be too liberal -- needs some thought and testing against bad-\d\d.ttl. > Dave > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008Jan/0128.html > via my Turtle issue list > http://github.com/dajobe/turtle/blob/master/ISSUES.md -- -ericP
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 21:50:57 UTC