- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:36:08 +0200
- To: Michael F Uschold <uschold@gmail.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Michael, Thanks for the feedback! I chose to consider Kayaks as a special kind of watercraft in order to exclude them from the domain of all properties associated with having a motor, because to my knowledge, kayaks are extremely rarely powered by an engine (other than e.g. canoes, which occasionally have small electric or combustion engines). By simply also making kayak a subclass of boat, one would recommend (*) a lot of properties that 99.9% of the kayaks in the world don't have (engine displacement etc.), which will irritate potential adopters. Otherwise, I would have needed rather "ontology expert" classes like "motorizableWaterVehicle" etc. This would also require complex class definitions for the range / domain definitions, which cause practical problems in many pure RDF and RDFS environments (e.g. resolving unionOf without an OWL reasoner is a pain for developers). So it was really just a decision for bringing order to the domains and ranges of typical properties. I hope this modeling compromise is acceptable for all kayakers in the world. Martin (*) I am well aware of the specific semantics of rdfs:range and rdfs:domain ;-) (**) I know that you know that I am not saying that a kayak is not a boat but just that a kayak does not always need to be a regular boat for everybody ;-) On 30.08.2010, at 20:36, Michael F Uschold wrote: > Overall this ontology is just fine, highly suitable for its intended > purpose. I do have one [hopefully] minor concern. Why is a kayak > not a kind of a boat? The classification in this ontology goes like > this: > • Watercraft > • Boat > • Kayak > • Ship > The source of this (IHMO) mistake may be in the WIkipedia entry for > Watercraft: > > However, there are a number of craft which many people would > consider neither a ship nor a boat, such as:canoes, kayaks, rafts, > barges, catamarans, hydrofoils, windsurfers, surfboards (when used > as a paddle board), jet skis, underwater robots, seaplanes, and > torpedoes. > > Contradictorily, the opening words in the definition of kayak in > Wikipedia clearly state that a kayak is a boat: > A kayak (sometimes generalised as a canoe) is a small human-powered > boat that traditionally has a covered deck, and one or more > cockpits, each seating one paddler who strokes a double-bladed paddle. > > I have been a kayaker for 35 years, and every kayaker I know thinks > and speaks of their kayak as a kind of boat. In the US, most > whitewater kayakers consider themselves boaters. > > What competency question justifies this classification? > What is an example of a kayak that is categorically not a boat? > > Michael > > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org > > wrote: > Dear all: > > I am happy to announce the first mature release of the Vehicle Sales > Ontology [1], a GoodRelations-compliant [2,3] Web vocabulary for > - Cars, > - Bikes, > - Boats, > - etc. > on the Web of Data. > > It can be used by car listing sites, bike or canoe rental services > and the like. > > In combination with > > - http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#owns and > - http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#seeks , > > it is also possible to expose ownership ("I own a Volkswagen Golf") > as part of online identity data or purchasing interest ("I am > looking for a canoe"). > > The ontology recommends DBPedia resource URIs as predefined > qualitative values as much as possible. > > Any feedback is very welcome. > > Best wishes > > Martin > [1] http://purl.org/vso/ns > [2] http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1 > [3] http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/Own_GoodRelations_Vocabularies > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > martin hepp > e-mail: mhepp@computer.org > www: http://www.heppnetz.de/ > skype: mfhepp > twitter: mfhepp > > Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! > ================================================================= > * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ > * Quickstart Guide for Developers: http://bit.ly/quickstart4gr > * Vocabulary Reference: http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1 > * Developer's Wiki: http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations > * Examples: http://bit.ly/cookbook4gr > * Presentations: http://bit.ly/grtalks > * Videos: http://bit.ly/grvideos > > > > > -- > Michael Uschold, PhD > LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu > Skype: UscholdM
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 10:45:13 UTC