- From: Stephane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:56:26 -0400
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>, Matthew Rowe <m.rowe@dcs.shef.ac.uk>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <z2i1452bf811004280456j943613a8mc2dd99e5894dcf80@mail.gmail.com>
> > > >> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elgg_%28software%29>Drupal and Wordpress >> also have a lot of what you're looking for. If you like Twitter, you'll love >> StatusNet. >> > > Drupal is going RDFa, with some good developers behind it. Satus,net has > FOAF support. > Besides RDFa, all users have an automatic WebID, and they can also host their FOAF+SSL certificate on their user profile page [1]. Steph. [1] http://github.com/scor/rdf/tree/master/rsapublickey/ > > >> >> Facebook have also opensourced some great code, eg. >> http://cassandra.apache.org/ >> >> This current situation is not for shortage of lines of code, or ability to >> re-use it. >> >> >>> Several organizations have asked us in the past if an open access open >>> source alternative to the FaceBook functionality could be created. >>> >>> How about creating a global open source code coop to develop such an >>> alternative? >>> >> >> The GNU project are just launching something in this direction - see >> http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/Group:GNU_Social ... it sounds just what >> you're looking for. I suggest joining the list >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/social-discuss --- I won't >> repeat my views here, but see >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/social-discuss/2010-03/msg00034.html where >> I argue that federation and standards are more important than creating set >> another software toolkit. >> >> >>> >>> Dozens of business models out there to make money. If we just consider >>> the following >>> - Usability on Blackberry, Eclipse and Android platforms >>> >> >> Who pays, how much, how often and how reliably? >> >> >>> - Open Feeds to other Social Networks >>> >> >> Who pays, how much, how often and how reliably? >> >> >>> - Linked Data standards for meta data encoding >>> >> >> Who pays, how much, how often and how reliably? >> >> >>> - Interfacing capability with Google functionality >>> >> >> Who pays, how much, how often and how reliably? >> >> >>> - External Formats Compatibility e.g. for professional networks like >>> LinkedIn >>> >> >> Who pays, how much, how often and how reliably? >> >> >>> - Feature Import for Email Providers like Yahoo!, Gmail >> >> >> Who pays, how much, how often and how reliably? >> >> >> It's the business / sustainability / bill-paying story that's interesting. >> Someone has to cover all those bandwidth bills if you're really going after >> 1% of humanity. Not to mention salaries, if your quality of service and >> support is going to cope with the burden of 100s of 1000s of non-technical >> users blundering around messing things up. Which means that charging $ for a >> 'pro' account or putting in advertising will soon be discussed. And then the >> folks with MBAs show up and what starts as idealism blends into the >> pre-existing landscape... >> >> >>> Most of features on FaceBook are a nuisance to professional users. >> >> >> "most?" :) what list are your working from here... >> >> >>> How many academically and technically trained professionals are there >>> out there, on a global scale? >>> >>> If we assume 1% of the global population, that would still be 65 million >>> potential users! >> >> >> I'm not sure the answer to "we don't like this megasite" is "so we'll >> build a better megasite, all free and open". I don't think the answer is >> "we'll build the one true distributed social-stuff toolkit" either (ie. my >> fear w/ current GNU Social). The answer - if there is one - is perhaps more >> boring. To do the dull but worth job of integrating, modernising and >> cross-linking the existing social infrastructure of the Web. How do we >> persuade people to put unthanked time into beautifying eg. MailMan or >> migrating the big IRC networks to XMPP, when instead they could be trying to >> "beat Facebook" and build another Web site bigger than many countries... >> >> cheers, >> >> Dan >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:57:00 UTC