- From: Uldis Bojars <uldis.bojars@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:05:51 +0100
- To: bnowack@semsol.com
- CC: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
Benjamin Nowack wrote:
>> I'd be very interested to engage in this. Please let me know if you have
>> concrete steps planned. Maybe first review existing vocabs to see what is
>> covered already, today?
>>
> I think a lot is available already, so what we mainly need is probably
> mainly a "suggested vocabulary blend":
> * type
> * rss:item
> * sioc:MicroblogPost
>
It is good to have an effort for consolidating vocabs used. Just a quick
reply with some thoughts for now (thesis writing in progress, last
couple of days to go).
SiocLog for representing IRC logs in RDF may have some similar vocab
patterns we could borrow: http://irc.sioc-project.org/
> * author stuff
> * dct:creator for author resource (profile vs person issue?)
> * sioc:has_creator for author profile/account URL
> * sioc:avatar / atom:link
> * links
> * dct:references (short or expanded? prolly the latter)
>
* sioc:links_to
Re. short vs. expanded we could use both.
For example, keep info about the actual URI used in the post but also
have a property pointing to its expanded version:
:entry1 a sioc:MicroblogPost ;
sioc:links_to <uri1> .
<uri1> ex:expandedUri <longUri1> .
Cheers,
Uldis
[ http://captsolo.net/ ]
Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 12:06:42 UTC