- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 04:27:50 -0700
- To: Raúl García Castro <rgcmme@gmail.com>
- Cc: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <4a4804720909030427x1f869b75jc65379701feee45d@mail.gmail.com>
Raul thanks a lot for posting this (I just yesterday found some papers of yours on semantic cms and was planning to contact you) I have seen the link when it circulated a few weeks back, and planned to get in touch with someone, but I was waiting for someone to come forward. However, yes! My first question is how can people (for example me) already working on evaluations, interact and contribute to SEALS, I have some work already started a few months back. If there is a mailing list, I ll be happyto post most specific questions/issues there cheers PDM On 9/3/09, Raúl García Castro <rgcmme@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Paola, > > If you are interested in the evaluation of semantic technologies, take a > look at the future outcomes of the SEALS European project ( > http://www.seals-project.eu/). > > In this project we aim to build an extensible infrastructure for the > evaluation of different types of semantic technologies: > .- ontology engineering tools > .- storage and reasoning systems > .- matching tools > .- semantic search tools > .- semantic web service tools > > Kind regards, > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Greetings good people! >> >> I am attempting to systematically aggregate as many independent >> evaluations of semantic software tools as possible >> >> (Note: by independent it is intended not carried out by people who are >> paid to do so, or have other vested interests - such as the >> devleopers or consultants themselves or their friends and familieis - >> but by unaffiliated users who are more suitable to appreciate its >> benefits and shorcomings) >> >> We are particularly interested initially in the software developed >> with EU funding (FP6 and FP7 ) >> >> The main frameworks of reference are standard software project >> evaluation methods, including >> >> >> EVALUATION AND RANKING OF ONTOLOGY CONSTRUCTION TOOLS (various >> references included there) >> Md. Ahsan-ul Murshed and Ramanjit Singh >> http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/archive/00000747/01/013.pdf >> >> >> I have already contacted offlist some of the individuals who have >> offered knowledge and views, and I am now seeking additional wider >> general input on >> >> 1. developing and customizing the review criteria and methodology >> (so that we can format the distributed evaluations using a common >> template) >> >> 2. any volunteered inputs in terms of reviews of software and other >> deliverables (priority is to assess cost/benefit ratio, measured in >> terms of >> functionality and usefulness) >> >> The final goal of this exercise is to contribute to improve the >> effectiveness of EU funding process in semantic web, as well as to >> general >> software output at large, as well as to come up with recommendations. >> >> >> Your contribution can be submitted authored or anonymous (subject to >> verification) >> >> >> Please contact me offlist should you wish to collaborate on this project, >> >> cheers >> >> Paola Di Maio >> > > -- > > Dr. Raúl García Castro > http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~rgarcia/<http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/%7Ergarcia/> > > Ontology Engineering Group (http://www.oeg-upm.net/) > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid > Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid > Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19 > -- Paola Di Maio ************************************************** Networked Research Lab, UK ***************************************************
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 11:28:32 UTC