- From: Sherman Monroe <sdmonroe@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 01:46:13 -0500
- To: carmen <_@whats-your.name>, semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <e23f467e0905132346g47f46bb1ka0c1feb88dcfaa89@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Carmen, Thanks for you feedback! > I was amazed in the many instances where I got better results from LOD > > dataspace than from Google/Technorati/Wikipedia. For example, searching > > Monopoly, then filtering to the *umbel-sc:MentalSituations* category gave > me > > a nice (and in some cases humorous) list of Monopoly knock-offs. I tried > > whats the URI to this query? > I just implemented a permalink, it can be found on the "green bar". Here is the link to the Monopoly query <http://ec2.monrai.com:8890/facets/> (it was only one click into the graph) > > > finding such a list on the WWW with no > > luck<http://www.google.com/search?q=Monopoly%20knockoffs>. > > monopoly inspired unofficial > > worked for me. didnt require clientside JS, or hosting for a Virtuoso > instance.. > > I tried that query<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Monopoly+inspired+unofficial&btnG=Search>, and still no list of knockoffs. > > > > Kingsley tells me that Entity Rank [4] has to do with this, but I wonder > > whether this quality will stick as the cloud increases. > > thankfully Google has been optimizing for cloud size of 'the entire > internet' (and including non-RDF resources) for about 12 years > > i think the 'hard and fast, one solution only' is a problem with SPARQL. > there was an interestring paper about using bloom filters from DERI at > WWW2k9 or something, for 'approximate results'. not sure if it meshed w/ > Bayes/Levenshtein et al > > That sounds like an interesting read, do you have the link to that ref? -- Thanks, -sherman I pray that you may prosper in all things and be healthy, even as your soul prospers (3 John 1:2)
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 06:46:49 UTC