- From: carmen <_@whats-your.name>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:47:08 -0400
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
> I was amazed in the many instances where I got better results from LOD > dataspace than from Google/Technorati/Wikipedia. For example, searching > Monopoly, then filtering to the *umbel-sc:MentalSituations* category gave me > a nice (and in some cases humorous) list of Monopoly knock-offs. I tried whats the URI to this query? > finding such a list on the WWW with no > luck<http://www.google.com/search?q=Monopoly%20knockoffs>. monopoly inspired unofficial worked for me. didnt require clientside JS, or hosting for a Virtuoso instance.. > Kingsley tells me that Entity Rank [4] has to do with this, but I wonder > whether this quality will stick as the cloud increases. thankfully Google has been optimizing for cloud size of 'the entire internet' (and including non-RDF resources) for about 12 years i think the 'hard and fast, one solution only' is a problem with SPARQL. there was an interestring paper about using bloom filters from DERI at WWW2k9 or something, for 'approximate results'. not sure if it meshed w/ Bayes/Levenshtein et al
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 19:47:50 UTC