- From: Stephane Corlosquet <stephane.corlosquet@deri.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 15:27:20 +0100
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi, I'd like to discuss various ways of referencing URIs in web applications. The particular case I'm interested in is vocabulary terms URIs which are often used across applications and in various RDF outputs. A typical use case is to annotate pieces of data stored in a database or in a structured representation of a knowledge base (see example below). For the RDFa in Drupal core effort, I'm looking for the best way to store URIs and keep it lightweight and developer friendly. I see three different methods for referencing vocabulary URIs. 1. Full URI. very verbose and not very readable. 2. CURIE. easy to read and user friendly. It requires to keep a prefix table of all the prefixes used in the system. It is also RDFa-ready in the sense it can be output as it is in the HTML output along with the prefix definitions. Using different versions of the same vocabularies is a little more complex, but that's an advanced feature which is not required at this stage. 3. By reference: all the terms used in the system are stored in a table and their id is used as reference, which involves extra processing. I lean towards solution 2 which I find to be the best compromise between portability, weight and usability. A typical use case is for representing a blog post for example: $object->title = 'Title of my blog post'; $object->created = '1235130980'; $object->user_id = 2; $object->body = 'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.'; $object->rdf_mappings = array( 'type' => 'sioct:Weblog', 'title' => 'dc:title', 'body' => 'sioc:content', 'user_id' => 'dc:creator', ); Has anyone used CURIEs as main format for storing URIs? Do you see any problem with it? regards, Stéphane.
Received on Saturday, 2 May 2009 14:28:36 UTC