- From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:37:17 +0000
- To: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c09b00eb0903051437r56325fa7i1c15cc9e553f249d@mail.gmail.com>
Peter, I think many of us are looking for ways to do what you describe from what I understand from your questions below > > 1. What vocabularies have you used to define a single free text > keyword? We'd rather use an existing term instead of inventing our own. depends on the domain, and the requirement. my suggestion would be define some sort of requirement for this vocabulary (scope, who would have to use it, for what) this will provide you with enough rationale to make a plan. you will of course tend to reuse as many existing words in use as possible, although there may be instances where the word in use will be many, and you will have to make decisions etc, I recommend you attend a vocamp ! > > > 2. For those organizations that have made an effort to structure their > list of keywords, what would you advise them use to make it easy for > them to publish it online and make references instead of free text > keywords in their document metadata? ther are a log of options, I would say once you have a vocabulary, or a community of people working on defining one, get onto knoodl.com, or similar other tool, semantic wiki also ,which will atomatically output an rdf representation when the vocabulary is reasonably agreed and finalized, it can be published in a place like schemaweb, I think pdm > > Thanking you in advance, > > Peter Krantz > > -- Paola Di Maio, **************************************** Forthcoming IEEE/DEST 09 Collective Intelligence Track (deadline extended) i-Semantics 2009, 2 - 4 September 2009, Graz, Austria. www.i-semantics.tugraz.at SEMAPRO 2009, Malta http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/CfPSEMAPRO09.html ************************************************** Mae Fah Luang Child Protection Project, Chiang Rai Thailand
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 22:37:57 UTC