- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:23:56 +0000
- To: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
> From: Peter Krantz > > Hi! > > I am in a government project where we are implementing RDF as a format > for legal information meta data from close to a hundred government > organizations. One ambition is to preserve the unstructured content > classification that many of these documents have today. Typically a > document has one or more keywords entered at the time of creation. > These are not from a controlled vocabulary and can be viewed more like > "tagging". > > Since I am a beginner in the semweb field I would be grateful > for your ideas. > > 1. What vocabularies have you used to define a single free text > keyword? We'd rather use an existing term instead of inventing our > own. > > 2. For those organizations that have made an effort to structure their > list of keywords, what would you advise them use to make it easy for > them to publish it online and make references instead of free text > keywords in their document metadata? > > Thanking you in advance, > > Peter Krantz Would WordNet help? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordNet David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated.
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 16:25:30 UTC