- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:26:46 -0800
- To: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>, "Azamat" <abdoul@cytanet.com.cy>
- Cc: "SW-forum" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>
- Message-ID: <DAEBB227FA8340FB8F3E58AEE03C8FFB@rhm8200>
Re: [ontolog-forum] EU FP Ontology projectsDuane I agree that there are many different contexts which may apply to the same reality. There may be N different contexts corresponding to the ways that N different people view the same reality. Further, one person may have M different contexts which correspond to M different purposes. My definition of a proposition is context + sentence. A person creates a proposition by choosing a context, then a sentence. This may cause a communication problem if a second person does not know, or chooses to ignore, the context of the person who created the proposition. It's not "isu" and "iss" that are changing, It's the context/hierarchy that is changing. There are N times M contexts/hierarchies for the single reality that you are thinking about. Dick McCullough Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done; knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Duane Nickull To: Richard H. McCullough ; Azamat Cc: SW-forum ; KR-language ; [ontolog-forum] Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 3:41 PM Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] EU FP Ontology projects I am not sure I think of it that way, although it interests me. IMO, context in a n..*-dimensional matrix whereby intersecting context details may or may not be visible to each aspect of a preposition. For example, one person, in a certain context, may deem me Duane Nickull even if I am dead where to others such would be false. As such, ontological research must IMO embrace this dichotomy with more of a quantum computing approach than the limited binary vision of the world. "Isu: seems based on simplistic predicate calculus. I can both be and not be Duane Nickull to two different observers. Likewise I may be Duane Nickull to both or them or neither of them. If I am dead, the government may no longer consider me to exist as Duane Nickull whereby my family may eternally believe I exist in spirit. Not to disagree, but I think the complete aspect of context is much more complex than can be represented in a hierarchy. Duane On 01/03/09 12:36 PM, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@pioneerca.com> wrote: I have defined "context" to be a list of propositions. But the propositions may refer to the hierarchy. Here is a list of propositions Dick McCullough isu person; Duane Nickull isu person; person iss entity; which is the same as this hierarchy begin hierarchy people; entity; / person; // i:Dick McCullough; // i:Duane Nickull; end hierarchy people; Dick McCullough Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done; knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Duane Nickull <mailto:dnickull@adobe.com> To: [ontolog-forum] <mailto:ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net> ; Richard H. McCullough <mailto:rhm@pioneerca.com> ; Azamat <mailto:abdoul@cytanet.com.cy> Cc: SW-forum <mailto:semantic-web@w3.org> ; KR-language <mailto:KR-language@YahooGroups.com> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 12:06 PM Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] EU FP Ontology projects Richard: Do you see "Context" strictly as a hierarchic node? I see it more of an omnipotent concept covering all other concepts. Would not a relation and action have contextual impact on the actual pragmatics? Duane On 01/03/09 11:59 AM, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@pioneerca.com> wrote: Azamat said I wonder how can it cover many different views with such a narrow reading of relationship, knowledge, and context? I neglected to make a very important point. This entity-characteristic-proposition hierarchy begin hierarchy tabula rasa; existent; / entity; # physical Entity / group; # abstract Entity / characteristic; # property // attribute; // part; /// context; /// sentence; // relation; // action; // interaction; / proposition; sentence; / statement; / question; / command; / assignment; / production; / conditional; / iteration; / quantification; end hierarchy tabula rasa; is my preferred hierarchy. But the mKR/mKE system can dynamically transform tabula rasa into another hierarchy by concept integration and differentiation, or it can use your favorite hierarchy instead. Dick McCullough Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done; knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/ -- ********************************************************************** Duane Nickull, Vancouver, BC Canada Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe LiveCycle ES and Enterprise Duane's World TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/#pg+1537 Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com Twitter - http://twitter.com/duanechaos Community Open Source Music - http://www.mixmatchmusic.com My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury ********************************************************************** -- ********************************************************************** Duane Nickull, Vancouver, BC Canada Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe LiveCycle ES and Enterprise Duane's World TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/#pg+1537 Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com Twitter - http://twitter.com/duanechaos Community Open Source Music - http://www.mixmatchmusic.com My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury **********************************************************************
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
Received on Monday, 2 March 2009 01:29:15 UTC