Richard:
Do you see "Context" strictly as a hierarchic node? I see it more of an omnipotent concept covering all other concepts. Would not a relation and action have contextual impact on the actual pragmatics?
Duane
On 01/03/09 11:59 AM, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@pioneerca.com> wrote:
Azamat said
I wonder how can it cover many different views with such
a narrow reading of relationship, knowledge, and context?
I neglected to make a very important point.
This entity-characteristic-proposition hierarchy
begin hierarchy tabula rasa;
existent;
/ entity; # physical Entity
/ group; # abstract Entity
/ characteristic; # property
// attribute;
// part;
/// context;
/// sentence;
// relation;
// action;
// interaction;
/ proposition;
sentence;
/ statement;
/ question;
/ command;
/ assignment;
/ production;
/ conditional;
/ iteration;
/ quantification;
end hierarchy tabula rasa;
is my preferred hierarchy.
But the mKR/mKE system can dynamically
transform tabula rasa into another hierarchy
by concept integration and differentiation,
or it can use your favorite hierarchy instead.
Dick McCullough
Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://mKRmKE.org/
--
**********************************************************************
Duane Nickull, Vancouver, BC Canada
Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe LiveCycle ES and Enterprise
Duane's World TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/#pg+1537
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Twitter - http://twitter.com/duanechaos
Community Open Source Music - http://www.mixmatchmusic.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
**********************************************************************
