- From: Yihong Ding <ding@cs.byu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:47:34 -0400
- To: kj@iteegosearch.com
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <8cbe5b450907090547o333f0d9ehd126afa9aa198fd5@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Kevin, I am working on developing the industry-scale ontologies too. I do not understand why you say it is difficult to not reuse the same properties. There is nothing wrong about reusing the same properties. Indeed, somehow it is even preferred. From defining restrictions over the subject classes, you do not need longer names defined to distinguish the varied object properties. yihong On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Kevin Jenkins <kj@iteegosearch.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > > > I’m working on an IT company, people and products ontology that is very > large. I’m running into problems with naming properties because it is > difficult to not reuse the same names. As a result, the names are getting > very long. I was wondering if anybody would be so kind as to point me in > the direction of some ontologies that use longer names but are still > considered to be well structured and intelligent. I need some inspiration. > Many thanks! Regards, Kevin. > > > -- =================================== Yihong Ding http://yihongs-research.blogspot.com/
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 12:48:17 UTC