RE: Ontology Naming Conventions

Can you give examples of the problems you are having?
 
John
 

Dr John Goodwin 
Research Scientist, Research, Ordnance Survey
C530, Romsey Road, SOUTHAMPTON, United Kingdom, SO16 4GU
Phone: +44 (0) 23 8030 5756 
 www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk| john.goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk 
Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this
email     

 


________________________________

	From: semantic-web-request@w3.org
[mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Jenkins
	Sent: 08 July 2009 17:58
	To: semantic-web@w3.org
	Subject: Ontology Naming Conventions
	
	

	Greetings,

	 

	I'm working on an IT company, people and products ontology that
is very large.  I'm running into problems with naming properties because
it is difficult to not reuse the same names.  As a result, the names are
getting very long.  I was wondering if anybody would be so kind as to
point me in the direction of some ontologies that use longer names but
are still considered to be well structured and intelligent.  I need some
inspiration.  Many thanks!  Regards, Kevin.

	 


This email is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email which must not be copied, distributed or disclosed to any other person.

Unless stated otherwise, the contents of this email are personal to the writer and do not represent the official view of Ordnance Survey. Nor can any contract be formed on Ordnance Survey's behalf via email. We reserve the right to monitor emails and attachments without prior notice.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Ordnance Survey
Romsey Road
Southampton SO16 4GU
Tel: 08456 050505
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk