2009-07-06 23:47 Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>: > > Right. BTW, you could now say that the domain of p was rdf:PlainLiteral > > :-) > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-plain-literal/ > > Yes, except isn't that exactly wrong? At least by the desired sense > noted in the topic of the mail message "literal has datatype D". > > A plain literal had datatype http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-plain-literal/ > which isn't any datatype other than itself. It certainly isn't and > xsd:date. At least, rdf:PlainLiteral isn't what _I_ was searching for. Alan, you got my question right in the sense that I was asking for how to represent the relation between a literal and its datatype for _any_ kind of datatype -- non-plain datatypes in particular. Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 21:59:10 UTC