- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:57:43 -0700
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Siarhei Uladzimiravich Kuryla <s.kuryla@jacobs-university.de>
Thanks Alan, I had made a mistake of not realising that the subject line did specify stuff about the property p. Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >> >> >> >>> I don't see any odd conclusions ... we have not said anything about the >>> realtionship between the subject and object of a p triple, other than the >>> usual they are related by the p-property. >>> >>> >>> > Yes, except isn't that exactly wrong? At least by the desired sense > noted in the topic of the mail message "literal has datatype D". > This suggests that we should have been talking all along about the explicitly typed literal having datatype (or even just rdf:type) being D. p a rdf:Property ; rdfs:domain rdfs:Literal ; rdfs:range rdfs:Datatype . _:x p xsd:int . _:x owl:sameAs "2"^^xsd:int . And possibly p rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:type . Jeremy
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 21:58:33 UTC