On Feb 20, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Richard Newman wrote: > Mark's point about attaching the longitude and latitude to the URL > is quite important: a particular JPEG at some URL is an > instantiation of some image, the taking of which is an event that > occurred at some place and time (or perhaps a composition of several > images, or a thumbnail of an image, or...). That's a pretty broad > network of facts. The work we did some years ago on photo annotation following the foaf workshop is probably still a good approach: http://esw.w3.org/topic/SimplePhotoAnnotation The lat/long should be attached to the photo with dcterms:spatial. > Similarly, the time a photograph was taken, the time a particular > version of it was produced, and the time that a particular JPEG file > was created on a server can all be different -- the first is > probably what users will want to search on, but the last is what the > filesystem will give you. We simply used dc:date for the date the photo was taken, but that might run afoul of using things like dcterms:created and dcterms:issued (because of sub-property relationships) if you're trying to encode those things. .gregReceived on Friday, 20 February 2009 22:39:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:11 UTC