W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [foaf-dev] FOAF sites offline during cleanup

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:14:22 +0200
Message-ID: <49F5776E.9040307@danbri.org>
To: Steve Harris <swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 27/4/09 11:02, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 27 Apr 2009, at 09:50, Ian Davis wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>> A lot of the hairyness of xmlsig comes from the transforms. I prefer
>> signing something nice and concrete, whether XML, RDFa or JSON.
>>
>> What % of "linked data" is truly free of bnodes?
>>
>> Well, anything in the Talis Platform for a start :)
>>
>> I think a good proportion of the linked data created since the LOD
>> project started is bnode-free. Obviously many other pre-existing
>> datasets are not.
>
> No, and not everything in the LOD world is bNode free either. With my
> RDF storage hat on they're a pain, but as a content creator, they're
> really handy.

+1

OWL is a notable example here...

cheers,

Dan
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 09:15:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:11 UTC