- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:14:22 +0200
- To: Steve Harris <swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 27/4/09 11:02, Steve Harris wrote: > On 27 Apr 2009, at 09:50, Ian Davis wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: >> A lot of the hairyness of xmlsig comes from the transforms. I prefer >> signing something nice and concrete, whether XML, RDFa or JSON. >> >> What % of "linked data" is truly free of bnodes? >> >> Well, anything in the Talis Platform for a start :) >> >> I think a good proportion of the linked data created since the LOD >> project started is bnode-free. Obviously many other pre-existing >> datasets are not. > > No, and not everything in the LOD world is bNode free either. With my > RDF storage hat on they're a pain, but as a content creator, they're > really handy. +1 OWL is a notable example here... cheers, Dan
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 09:15:06 UTC