Paula, WSMO is bettered compared with OWL-S -- and perhaps in conception, with SAWSDL. If you look at WSMO, it is not so much a language as an ontology(ies), and specifically addressing web services. Just as OWL-S is formalized/represented in OWL, WSMO is formalized/represented in WSML. So you are perhaps confusing content with the language the content is modeled in. WSMO: http://www.wsmo.org/index.html. WSML: http://www.wsmo.org/wsml/ OWL-S: http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/ You might look at: Roman, Dumitru; Jos de Bruijn; Adrian Mocan; Holger Lausen; John Domingue; Christoph Bussler; Dieter Fensel. 2006. WWW: WSMO, WSML, and WSMX in a Nutshell. In ASWC pp. 516-522, 2006. http://tw.rpi.edu/wiki/WWW:_WSMO,_WSML,_and_WSMX_in_a_Nutshell. Roman, Dumitru; Uwe Keller; Holger Lausen; Jos de Bruijn; Rubén Lara; Michael Stollberg; Axel Polleres; Cristina Feier; Christoph Bussler; and Dieter Fensel. 2005. Web Service Modeling Ontology, Applied Ontology, 1(1): 77 - 106, 2005. Thanks, Leo _____________________________________________ Dr. Leo Obrst The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics lobrst@mitre.org Center for Innovative Computing & Informatics Voice: 703-983-6770 7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305 Fax: 703-983-1379 McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of paola.dimaio@gmail.com Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:15 PM To: Semantic Web Subject: wsmo Has anyone had any chance to evaluate applications of wsmo as an alternative to owl? I may have seen wsmo in passing before, but its only when I was given the demo that I noticed that its no .owl but .wsmo file extension could this be pointing to an alternative standard? any use there? cheers -- Paola Di Maio, ****************************************Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 19:51:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:11 UTC