- From: Michael Lang(Jr.) <michaelallenlang@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:29:38 -0400
- To: paola.dimaio@gmail.com
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 19:30:14 UTC
Paola,
This is a comparison between WSMO and OWL-S done by DERI:
http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d4/d4.2/v0.1/20040315/
Mike Lang
Revelytix, Inc.
phone: 410-584-0009 (office)
443-928-3782 (cell)
skype: michael.allen.lang.jr
aim: MikeJrRevelytix
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone had any chance to evaluate applications of wsmo as an
> alternative to owl?
>
> I may have seen wsmo in passing before, but its only when I was given the
> demo that I noticed
> that its no .owl but .wsmo file extension
>
> could this be pointing to an alternative standard? any use there?
> cheers
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paola Di Maio,
> ****************************************
>
>
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 19:30:14 UTC