W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2009

Re: wsmo

From: Michael Lang(Jr.) <michaelallenlang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:29:38 -0400
Message-ID: <59c1f5620904031229x5bb15eccy3c2d1c74b63a58ba@mail.gmail.com>
To: paola.dimaio@gmail.com
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Paola,
This is a comparison between WSMO and OWL-S done by DERI:

http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d4/d4.2/v0.1/20040315/

Mike Lang
Revelytix, Inc.

phone: 410-584-0009 (office)
          443-928-3782 (cell)
skype: michael.allen.lang.jr
aim: MikeJrRevelytix


On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anyone had any chance to evaluate applications of wsmo as an
> alternative to owl?
>
> I may have seen  wsmo in passing before, but its only when I was given the
> demo that I noticed
> that its no .owl  but .wsmo file extension
>
> could this be pointing to an alternative standard? any use there?
> cheers
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paola Di Maio,
> ****************************************
>
>
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 19:30:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:15 UTC