- From: Michael Lang(Jr.) <michaelallenlang@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:29:38 -0400
- To: paola.dimaio@gmail.com
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 19:30:14 UTC
Paola, This is a comparison between WSMO and OWL-S done by DERI: http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d4/d4.2/v0.1/20040315/ Mike Lang Revelytix, Inc. phone: 410-584-0009 (office) 443-928-3782 (cell) skype: michael.allen.lang.jr aim: MikeJrRevelytix On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone had any chance to evaluate applications of wsmo as an > alternative to owl? > > I may have seen wsmo in passing before, but its only when I was given the > demo that I noticed > that its no .owl but .wsmo file extension > > could this be pointing to an alternative standard? any use there? > cheers > > > > > -- > Paola Di Maio, > **************************************** > >
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 19:30:14 UTC