- From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:57:02 +0100
- To: Dennis - UT <dv.eprints@gmail.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <c09b00eb0904011157t6fe9535cma92da351bc2beb8f@mail.gmail.com>
Dennis I am also researching relations I have found reading about the following useful 1. lexical relations 2. OBO Foundry ontology of relations some excerpts from Azamats posts and other writings http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2009-02/msg00315.html however I am much puzzled by the fact that relations are considere as 'properties' of class while in my view , or as in 'entity/relationship' representatio relations are a different primitive type (canonical class?) by themselves, I would be intersted in a clarification of why/how is that so Paola On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Dennis - UT <dv.eprints@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We are currently working on a repository for OAI ORE resource maps ( > http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/toc). In this system we are trying to > describe relations between scientific publications and other material (both > scientific and non-scientific). To do this we are planning to use several > (RDF) vocabularies / ontologies. > > A question is: how to cope with diversity in scientific disciplines and > communication on the one hand and standardizing relation descriptions when > aggregating publications about a certain topic? Vocabularies now available > (FOAF, DCterms, etc) mainly restrict to formal relations and do not include > relations concerning the content in a more detailed way than for instance > 'dc:subject'. This may be the consequence of the diversity in scientific > semantics. Is there any literature/article about this issue? > > An example case is describing relations between scientific publications and > their 'application'. For example: a publication proposes certain changes, > government policy makers later decide to create actual policies based on > this information. So far we didn’t find any existing solution to describe > such relations. Suggestions on existing vocabularies to describe / annotate > such relations are very welcome, thanks! > > Kind regards, > > Dennis > University of Twente > > -- Paola Di Maio, **************************************** Forthcoming IEEE/DEST 09 Collective Intelligence Track (deadline extended) i-Semantics 2009, 2 - 4 September 2009, Graz, Austria. www.i-semantics.tugraz.at SEMAPRO 2009, Malta http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/CfPSEMAPRO09.html ************************************************** Mae Fah Luang Child Protection Project, Chiang Rai Thailand
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 18:57:44 UTC