- From: रविंदर ठाकुर (ravinder thakur) <ravinderthakur@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:14:23 +0530
- To: metadataportals@yahoo.com
- Cc: "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, semantic_web@googlegroups.com, "Andreas Langegger" <al@jku.at>
- Message-ID: <617073f10810200744r19d5ed56kca65a70366988a68@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>What sort of stuff does a linked-data space enable? What sorts of >>>>things can you _do_ with a linked data graph that you couldn't do >>>>before? A lot depends upon the kind of data we have. Assuming we have the requisite data i would expect best system to give answers to queries like "world population in 1968" as 3.5 billion and not something like this<http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=6KG&q=world+population+in+1968&btnG=Search&meta=>(the current best system). How good and confident a system is which says he has found *489,000* matches for a simple one word question like this. The reason for this is the underlying architecture used to process the data. Unless that architecture is moved form a word analysis based system(pagerank etc) to one based on meaning (SW) there isn't much scope to improve. >>>>Where are the real, working, non-hypothetical applications I >>>>can play with now that use say the linked-open-data space?. There isn't any real semantic web application that i know of. Please do let me know if anyone knows one. >>>>How do we get people excited enough about these things to invest the time in >>>> making their data assets available in this way on the web? These are >>>>the questions I personally need help with. The point is data owners wont be doing it unless they find some monetary benefit in this. One or two might share, but there will always be a bigger proportion that wont be sharing their data. But the point is why should we wait for others to share their data. Why not create our own semantic data ? If the approach of convincing people to share their data is not working why not take the other one or even better why not use both the approaches. We only stand to gain with these approaches.
Received on Monday, 20 October 2008 14:44:59 UTC