- From: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:28:20 -0800
- To: Michael Lang <michaelalang@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Michael F Uschold" <uschold@gmail.com>, "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, cshankey@reinvent.com, semantic-web@w3.org, "aldo gangemi" <aldo.gangemi@gmail.com>, "Peter Mika" <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, "Ora Lassila" <ora.lassila@nokia.com>, "Dr Jeff Z. Pan" <jeff.z.pan@abdn.ac.uk>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@csail.mit.edu>, "Frank van Harmelen" <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, "sean bechhofer" <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>, "Michael Lang(Jr.)" <michaelallenlang@gmail.com>
On Nov 7, 2008, at 6:35 AM, Michael Lang wrote: > I agree that audit trails should be kept of all changes (like > wikipedia) and we support that, but not that they all need to be > versioned. Sorry, if I have the audit trail don't I effectively have versions? Or is there a special meaning to 'versioned', like putting out new URIs? I hadn't been appreciating any distinction.
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 19:29:12 UTC