- From: Sw-MetaPortal-ProjectParadigm <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:53:51 -0800 (PST)
- To: Mike Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <455311.95906.qm@web45508.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Mike, I downloaded your listing last year. It is a good start but also a long way off from having a good overview of the gaps in the transition to a scenario in which SW apps, IDEs, add-ons and plugins are available for mainstream web site design and creation. Too much effort in the SW community is bottom up, whereas the internet typically works topdown. Milton Ponson GSM: +297 747 8280 Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation PO Box 1154, Oranjestad Aruba, Dutch Caribbean www.rainbowwarriors.net (under revision) Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide www.projectparadigm.info (under construction) NGO-Opensource: Creating ICT tools for NGOs worldwide for Project Paradigm www.ngo-opensource.org (proposed project) MetaPortal: providing online access to web sites and repositories of data and information for sustainable development www.metaportal.info (proposed project) SemanticWebSoftware, part of NGO-Opensource to enable SW technologies in the Metaportal project (proposed site: www.semanticwebsoftware.org) --- On Thu, 11/6/08, Mike Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com> wrote: From: Mike Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com> Subject: Re: Use of Content Management Systems, ranking and usage in Semantic Web To: metadataportals@yahoo.com Cc: semantic-web@w3.org Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 6:20 PM Hi Milton, Sw-MetaPortal-ProjectParadigm wrote: > Dear all, > > In order to transition from plain vanilla web sites with run-of-the-mill content management systems (CMSs) to semantic web enabled sites with corresponding CMSs, a lot of functionality has to be added. > > We are trying to find out if any reports exist on the ranking and usage in Semantic Web context of CMSs and also if comparison tables exist, e.g. listing SW standards, metadata sets and other items compared for the CMSs and also, who are the users of such CMSs? > > Many non-profits are migrating to web sites with CMSs, of which Plone, Joomla and Drupal seem to be quite popular. > > But we feel that the popular ranking and usage of available CMSs does not necessarily reflect the ranking as per SW functionality. > > Another issue of particular importance for users of such sites is browser add-ons and plugins for semantic web technologies. > > Are there any reports,list, directories and comparison charts for currently available browsers, listing available plugins and add-ons? Here is a listing of 30 FF semWeb-related extensions from 18 months ago I know to be substantially out of date: http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=317 And, you can also do various filters and sorts (Javascript, for one; PHP for many CMS-related) on the 700 Sweet Tools listing for a more recent cut: http://www.mkbergman.com/?page_id=325 Thanks, Mike
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 21:54:39 UTC