- From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:39:34 +0100
- To: kidehen@openlinksw.com
- Cc: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>
- Message-Id: <04043324-23EC-4941-8E35-C56CF58526D2@bblfish.net>
Just to say here that I agree with Kingsley's answers. Also thanks for making me aware of POWDER's new GRDDLable XML format. Very nice. I think POWDER could be useful here at some point. Also notice how I am able to sign my foaf file at http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card.n3 with the following relations <http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card.rdf> wot:assurance <http://bblfish.net/people/henry/ asc.card.rdf.asc> ; awol:type "application/rdf+xml" . <http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card.n3> wot:assurance <http://bblfish.net/people/henry/ asc.card.n3.asc> ; awol:type "text/rdf+n3" . HTTP also has headers to help determine the length of validity of a representation. So one can also get some way using that. Henry On 26 Mar 2008, at 14:53, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > > Phil Archer wrote: >> Henry, all, >> >> I've jumped back to the start of this thread to raise an additional >> concern/use case about the whole issue of data portability and >> privacy protection. >> >> I've been told many times that once asserted, an RDF triple >> persists until the entropic heath death of the universe. Therefore >> any privacy protection system that depends on triples, at least in >> theory, cannot support the rather human practices of growing up, >> changing one's mind, changing jobs etc. >> >> If I allow my e-mail address to be seen by anyone who is no more >> than 2 hops from my FOAF file, I would want that check be carried >> out in real time so that if I deleted someone from my FOAF file, >> the permission would not be granted. But does this break the >> Semantic model? > Phil, > > Simple answer is: No. >> >> In the POWDER WG, with help from Jeremy Carroll, we've defined a >> semantic extension to make it possible to put an expiry date on >> triples [1]. Can something like this be worked into data portability? >> >> I could back this up with a nice gentle "I've changed job so no >> more e-mail about its staff social functions please" but here's a >> more scary one: >> >> Imagine a teenage girl who is being abused at home. She uses her >> social network to call for help. Luckily, she finds it and manages >> to escape the dangerous home life. Now she wants to keep in touch >> with her new support network but become invisible to her former >> abuser. > She assumes a new Identity via a new URI in here new Social Space. >> >> In short, any privacy control needs to support changing >> circumstances. > One URI dies and another is born :-) > > > Kingsley >> >> Phil. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-dr-20080317/#temporalSE >> > > > -- > > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:40:26 UTC